2026 ranking of countries offering Digital Nomad Visas and residence permits
Quick overview
The top 5 countries for digital nomads are New Zealand, Dominica, Malta, Australia and Malaysia.
New Zealand ranks 1st, receiving the highest score due to a combination of relatively low minimum income requirements, just $610 a month, a very high level of safety, almost full internet coverage across the country, and English as an official language.
Dominica ranks highly thanks to its safety score and
Malta is one of the most balanced destinations in the ranking: it shows excellent results for safety, internet quality and English language use, but the income threshold is comparatively high — €3,500, or about $4,100 a month.
Australia shows high scores for safety, connectivity and the language environment but trails the leaders because of strict financial requirements and the high cost of living. For comparison, a family of 4 in Sydney needs about $4,600 on average, excluding rent; in Valletta, Malta, the figure is $3,600, and in Kuala Lumpur, about $2,000.
Malaysia is the most practical option in the top 5. It combines a low cost of living, an accessible entry threshold and fast internet, while local residents have a good command of English. Its weak point compared with the leaders is the level of safety.
Among EU countries, the leaders are Malta, Hungary, and the Netherlands. Malta ranks 1st within the European Union thanks to its balanced indicators. Hungary trails because of high income requirements, while the Netherlands ranks lower because of its high cost of living.
In Asia, the leaders are Malaysia, Kazakhstan, and South Korea. Malaysia offers the best balance in the region between cost of living, visa accessibility in terms of income requirements, internet quality and English proficiency. Kazakhstan’s weak point is the low level of English, while South Korea’s is the high entry threshold for applicants.
In North America, the leaders are Costa Rica, El Salvador and Belize. Costa Rica ranks first in the region thanks to its safety, internet accessibility and cost of living. El Salvador has more modest internet accessibility indicators, while Belize requires a higher income.
In South America, the top 3 are Argentina, Brazil and Ecuador. Argentina leads thanks to the quality of its internet coverage and moderate income requirements. Brazil has an average level of safety and weak English proficiency. Ecuador makes the top three as a more affordable option in terms of both living costs and income requirements.
About the Passportivity ranking
Most rankings for expats are based on subjective surveys or on countries’ appeal as tourist destinations. Passportivity uses an engineering approach: we compare countries using measurable indicators and assess the balance between ease of obtaining a visa and quality of life.
The aim of the study is to objectively compare countries offering Digital Nomad Visas and residence permits using measurable criteria and to determine which of them offer the most attractive conditions in terms of ease of relocation and quality of life.
The main criteria used to assess conditions for digital nomads are the applicant’s minimum monthly income requirement, cost of living, level of safety, local residents’ level of English proficiency, and internet availability. Reference criteria include the average speed of mobile and fixed internet, which may become decisive factors when choosing a country.
The Passportivity Index is a composite indicator that combines World Bank macroeconomic data with manually collected data on visa requirements in each country.
We rely only on verified sources: international databases and official sources, such as the World Bank, to assess the state of the macroeconomy, safety and the level of digitalisation; or government websites, to collect visa requirements.
Complete ranking of countries offering Digital Nomad Visas and residence permits
| № | Country | Total score | Region | Monthly income | Cost of living | Safety level | Internet access | Mobile/home Internet speed | English proficiency index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Zealand | 87,3 | Oceania | 610 | $$$$ | Very High | 96 | 128/217 | Native / Official Language |
| 2 | Dominica | 85,3 | Caribbean | 4167 | $$$ | Very High | 83 | - /47 | Native / Official Language |
| 3 | Malta | 85,1 | Europe | 4109 | $$$ | High | 92 | 125/187 | Native / Official Language |
| 4 | Australia | 84,8 | Oceania | 3300 | $$$$ | High | 97 | 128/135 | Native / Official Language |
| 5 | Malaysia | 82,9 | Asia | 2000 | $ | High | 98 | 139/161 | High Proficiency |
| 6 | Grenada | 81,0 | Caribbean | 3620 | $$$ | Very High | 74 | - /91 | Native / Official Language |
| 7 | Hungary | 80,8 | Europe | 3522 | $$$ | High | 93 | 85/230 | High Proficiency |
| 8 | Netherlands | 78,7 | Europe | 1761 | $$$$ | High | 97 | 163/218 | Very High Proficiency |
| 9 | Norway | 78,5 | Europe | 3495 | $$$$ | High | 99 | 156/161 | Very High Proficiency |
| 10 | Namibia | 78,1 | Africa | 2000 | $$ | High | 64 | 27/16 | Native / Official Language |
| 11 | UAE | 78,0 | West Asia | 3500 | $$$ | High | 100 | 652/343 | Low Proficiency |
| 12 | Slovenia | 77,8 | Europe | 3757 | $$$ | High | 90 | 139/122 | High Proficiency |
| 13 | Antigua and Barbuda | 77,4 | Caribbean | 4167 | $$$ | High | 77 | 33/41 | Native / Official Language |
| 14 | Romania | 76,7 | Europe | 4344 | $$ | High | 91 | 78/261 | Very High Proficiency |
| 15 | Finland | 76,4 | Europe | 1409 | $$$$ | High | 93 | 134/157 | Very High Proficiency |
| 16 | Spain | 75,8 | Europe | 3244 | $$$ | High | 95 | 81/255 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 17 | Croatia | 75,8 | Europe | 3868 | $$$ | High | 83 | 115/97 | Very High Proficiency |
| 18 | Montenegro | 75,5 | Europe | 1585 | $$ | High | 88 | 81/96 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 19 | Portugal | 75,4 | Europe | 4086 | $$$ | High | 88 | 140/227 | Very High Proficiency |
| 20 | Costa Rica | 75,1 | North America | 3000 | $$$ | Very High | 85 | 78/153 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 21 | Argentina | 74,1 | South America | 2500 | $$$ | Moderate | 89 | 59/105 | High Proficiency |
| 22 | Albania | 73,6 | Europe | 957 | $$ | High | 83 | 96/86 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 23 | Barbados | 73,6 | Caribbean | 4167 | $$$$$ | Very High | 80 | 16/97 | Native / Official Language |
| 24 | Latvia | 73,5 | Europe | 4946 | $$$ | High | 92 | 136/120 | High Proficiency |
| 25 | Italy | 72,5 | Europe | 3170 | $$$ | High | 89 | 85/103 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 26 | Georgia | 72,0 | Europe | 2000 | $ | Moderate | 81 | 156/44 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 27 | Kazakhstan | 71,9 | Asia | 3000 | $ | Moderate | 93 | 94/82 | Very Low Proficiency |
| 28 | Cyprus | 71,9 | Europe | 4109 | $$$ | High | 91 | 109/130 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 29 | Greece | 70,9 | Europe | 4109 | $$$ | High | 86 | 129/80 | High Proficiency |
| 30 | Germany | 70,6 | Europe | 4725 | $$$$ | High | 93 | 75/101 | Very High Proficiency |
| 31 | France | 69,7 | Europe | 2113 | $$$$ | High | 88 | 139/332 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 32 | Estonia | 69,5 | Europe | 5283 | $$$ | High | 92 | 143/93 | High Proficiency |
| 33 | South Korea | 68,5 | Asia | 5470 | $$$ | High | 97 | 230/234 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 34 | Moldova | 67,2 | Europe | 1500 | $$ | Moderate | 80 | 55/164 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 35 | Brazil | 67,0 | South America | 1500 | $$$ | Moderate | 84 | 251/215 | Low Proficiency |
| 36 | Türkiye | 66,6 | Middle East | 3000 | $$ | Low | 87 | 69/64 | Low Proficiency |
| 37 | El Salvador | 66,0 | North America | 1460 | $$ | High | 67 | 42/91 | Moderate Proficiency |
| 38 | Ecuador | 65,9 | South America | 1380 | $$ | Moderate | 77 | 39/139 | Low Proficiency |
| 39 | Belize | 65,8 | North America | 6250 | $$$ | High | 72 | 71/48 | Native / Official Language |
| 40 | Panama | 64,6 | North America | 3000 | $$$ | High | 68 | 30/192 | Low Proficiency |
| 41 | Colombia | 64,2 | South America | 1050 | $$ | Moderate | 77 | 40/199 | Low Proficiency |
| 42 | Japan | 61,2 | Asia | 6104 | $$$ | Very High | 87 | 63/219 | Very Low Proficiency |
| 43 | Indonesia, Bali | 58,4 | Asia | 5000 | $ | Moderate | 72 | 49/42 | Low Proficiency |
| 44 | Mexico | 57,8 | North America | 4290 | $$$ | Moderate | 81 | 41/91 | Very Low Proficiency |
| 45 | Sri Lanka | 57,2 | Asia | 2000 | $ | Moderate | 51 | 42/32 | Low Proficiency |
| 46 | Cayman Islands | 57,0 | Caribbean | 8334 | $$$$$ | Very High | 81 | 119/118 | Native / Official Language |
| 47 | Iceland | 54,2 | Europe | 8570 | $$$$$ | Very High | 99 | 137/289 | Very High Proficiency |
| 48 | Kenya | 47,8 | Africa | 4584 | $ | Low | 35 | 50/15 | High Proficiency |
Methodology
To compile the ranking of countries offering Digital Nomad Visas and residence permits, Passportivity’s experts used reliable data available as of the end of 2025.
Choice of sources
The main data sources for the ranking were laws and government websites from more than 40 jurisdictions, as well as public reports and databases of international organisations, including the World Bank.
Secondary sources were used only if they referred to
Data from before 2024 were rechecked for updates or excluded if they were no longer applicable. This approach ensures that the ranking reflects the conditions in place as of 2025.
Assessment criteria
To compile the ranking, Passportivity’s experts selected five key criteria that reflect the real experience of digital nomads when choosing a country to relocate to:
- Minimum monthly income requirements for the applicant.
- Cost of living.
- Safety level.
- Local residents’ level of English proficiency.
- Internet availability.
To obtain comparable data, the indicators were processed using a transparent system of weighting and normalisation.
1. Minimum income requirements for the applicant
The main filter when choosing a country to relocate to is the entry threshold, or the applicant’s income requirement. Countries usually regulate:
- amount of monthly income required for the main applicant;
- conditions for family members to join the applicant;
- income basis — before tax or after tax;
- currency.
For the ranking, Passportivity’s specialists used the salary of a single applicant, and all currencies were converted into US dollars to ensure comparability. All data were taken from the official websites of migration authorities in more than 40 jurisdictions.
Assessment logic: the lower the value, the higher the score.
2. Cost of living
Based on Passportivity’s experts’ experience, digital nomads look for an opportunity to earn in a strong currency and spend in places where life is cheaper. To assess the cost of living, Purchasing Power Parity, or PPP, was used, an economic indicator that makes it possible to compare how many goods and services can be bought for the same amount of money in different countries.
Countries where the purchasing power of the dollar or euro is highest receive a high PPP score. The lower the coefficient, the cheaper goods and services are compared with the United States. The source of the
Assessment logic: the lower the value, the higher the index score.
3. Internet availability
For a remote worker, stable internet is a basic condition for everyday life and work. This indicator reflects how realistic it is to work from a given country without constant disruptions and connectivity issues.
Passportivity’s experts considered the share of the population with internet access, which helps show how well the network covers the country as a whole rather than only tourist areas. Reference data on the average speed of fixed and mobile internet were also taken into account.
If, for example, 99% of the population uses the internet, this usually means that connectivity is stable and widely available across the country, rather than only in city centres or hotel lobbies. High internet speed and strong IT infrastructure indicators also suggest that a country is better suited to remote work.
Assessment logic: the higher the value, the higher the score.
4. Safety level
Relocating to another country is always associated with risk, so it is important for digital nomads to understand how well the rule of law functions in a country and how predictable the political environment is. Risks for the ranking were assessed on the basis of institutional data rather than crime reports.
The Political Stability and Absence of Violence Index shows how stable state institutions are in a country, how low the risk of internal conflict is, and how effectively law enforcement operates.
Assessment logic: the higher the value, the higher the score.
5. English proficiency of the local population
The ability to communicate at a pharmacy, in a shop or in a government office directly affects quality of life and the speed of adaptation for foreigners working remotely. Priority was given to countries whose populations have a sufficient level of English for everyday communication without an interpreter.
Assessment logic: the higher the value, the higher the score.
Calculation formula
The Passportivity Index, or Passportivity Score, is calculated using a weighted formula. The experts assigned the weights on the basis of surveys of digital nomads, giving priority to visa accessibility and cost of living.
Passportivity Score = 0.30(V) + 0.15(A) + 0.25(D) + 0.15(S) + 0.15(L)
Where:
30% — visa accessibility (V), reflecting the applicant’s income requirements;
15% — cost of living (A);
25% — internet availability (D);
15% — safety (S);
15% — English proficiency (L).
All data were normalised on a scale from 0 to 100 before the weighting coefficients were applied.
Sources
- Ranking of countries by the number and share of internet users for 2024, World Bank.
- English Proficiency Index for 2025, Education First, the world’s largest international education company.
- Global Index of mobile and fixed broadband internet speeds for 2025, the Speedtest web service.
- Statistics for 2025 from the SpeedGeo web portal, which assesses internet speed around the world.
- Broadband internet speed ranking for 2024, based on data from analysts at the Worldwide Broadband Speed League.
Notes
The ranking has been prepared for educational and informational purposes. It does not constitute advertising or a recommendation regarding immigration decisions.
The calculations are based in part on open data from the World Bank and EF EPI; however, the World Bank and EF bear no responsibility for the interpretation of the data or the final conclusions.
The materials may be used as reference information, provided that the source and a link to the ranking are indicated. We hope that the data collected will serve as a useful guide when choosing a country for relocation.
Request Expert Commentary or Custom Research
Are you a journalist or an analyst, or do you work with high-net-worth individuals and need verified data, expert comments on investment migration, or market research for a specific task? We are ready to help.
Elena Dukach
Chief Executive Officer
Frequently asked questions
When choosing a country to relocate to, digital nomads usually consider income requirements, cost of living, level of safety, internet availability, and the level of English proficiency among local residents.
In the Passportivity ranking, which compares countries across all key criteria, the top 5 countries with the best conditions for digital nomads are New Zealand, Dominica, Malta, Australia and Malaysia.
To qualify for a Digital Nomad Visa, and then for a residence permit, you must prove income from foreign sources. Each country sets its own income requirements: for example, in Spain the minimum income is €2,850, while in Hungary it is €3,000 per month.
Yes, the rules of most digital nomad programmes allow applicants to relocate together with a wife or husband and children under 18.


